On March 9, 2026, a roundtable was held at the Civil Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court, during which the results of the study "Jurisdictional Analysis of Judicial Control in Ukraine" were presented. The study was prepared by the Public Organization "Interregional Expert Center "Pro Justice"" with the support of the European Union project "Pravo-Justice".
Presenting the results of the study, the head of the managing partner of the Ares Law Company Law Association, Roman Chumak, noted that the purpose of preparing the report was to comprehensively study the mechanisms of judicial control over the execution of court decisions through the prism of sociological research and analysis of judicial practice. According to him, the authors of the study focused on how this tool is used in various types of legal proceedings.
In particular, the study analyzed the practice of applying judicial control mechanisms in administrative jurisdiction, where this tool has already received more systematic use. At the same time, in civil and commercial legal proceedings, the practice of applying judicial control is only being formed, which necessitates the need for further development of law enforcement and improvement of regulatory regulation.
The participants of the round table discussed problematic issues related to the execution of court decisions, as well as the role of the court in ensuring effective control over their execution. During the discussion, it was emphasized that the execution of a court decision is an integral part of the right to a fair trial and the final stage of judicial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of an individual.
Following the discussion, the participants of the event emphasized the importance of further development of mechanisms of judicial control and generalization of judicial practice. At the same time, it was emphasized that within the framework of the conducted study, the goal was for the first time to systematically measure how the instrument of judicial control works in practice from the positions of the participants in the process in three jurisdictions - administrative, civil and economic. The results obtained can become the basis for further improvement of legislation and practice of ensuring the execution of court decisions.